Pennsylvania awaits test results for Zika virus
A doctor checks a test tube with a blood sample for Zika virus testing from a pregnant woman, at the maternity ward of a hospital in Guatemala on Jan. 28, 2016.
Photo by REUTERS
Pennsylvania health officials are awaiting test results for seven state residents who may have contracted the mosquito-borne Zika virus while recently traveling out of the country.
Test results came back for one other Pennsylvania resident who tested negative, state officials said Monday.
So far, no locally transmitted Zika cases have been reported in the United States. The illness has been reported in travelers returning from affected countries, although it cannot be transmitted from person to person.
It could take the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention up to two weeks to complete the remaining tests at its laboratories in Atlanta.
The state health department plans to release local updates on a weekly basis.
The primary mosquito that carries Zika is not found in Pennsylvania, experts said. However, the Asian tiger mosquito, a secondary type of mosquito that can carry the disease, has been found in the state.
There is no cure for the Zika virus, and there is no vaccine to prevent it. In many cases, symptoms are mild or go unnoticed, experts said. Zika spreads through mosquito bites, and symptoms include fever, rash, joint pain and red eyes.
However, Zika has been linked to an increase in the births of babies with abnormally small heads in Brazil, a condition known as microcephaly.
The World Health Organization said the virus could affect as many as 4 million people in the Americas.
The virus has been confirmed in more than 20 countries, mostly in Central and South America, according to the CDC. It is spread by the same mosquito that spreads dengue and yellow fever.
Ben Schmitt is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7991 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.