ShareThis Page

Fayette County robotic arm recipient highlighted in White House Frontiers Conference

Wes Venteicher
| Thursday, Oct. 13, 2016, 12:09 p.m.
Nathan Copeland, a 30-year-old quadriplegic who lives in Dunbar, poses for a photo with a robotic arm he has been using as part of a clinical trial at the University of Pittsburgh. The hand on the robotic arm transmits the sense of touch directly to microelectrode arrays on his brain.
UPMC/Pitt Health Sciences
Nathan Copeland, a 30-year-old quadriplegic who lives in Dunbar, poses for a photo with a robotic arm he has been using as part of a clinical trial at the University of Pittsburgh. The hand on the robotic arm transmits the sense of touch directly to microelectrode arrays on his brain.
This image from video, provided by UPMC/Pitt Health Sciences, taken Oct. 26, 2015, shows University of Pittsburgh researcher Robert Gaunt preparing Nathan Copeland for research testing if brain implants could help the paralyzed man feel sensation in his own hand while using a mind-controlled robotic arm.
This image from video, provided by UPMC/Pitt Health Sciences, taken Oct. 26, 2015, shows University of Pittsburgh researcher Robert Gaunt preparing Nathan Copeland for research testing if brain implants could help the paralyzed man feel sensation in his own hand while using a mind-controlled robotic arm.
President Barack Obama talks with Nathan Copeland, right, during a tour of innovation projects at the White House Frontiers Conference at University of Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh, Thursday, Oct. 13, 2016. Copeland demonstrates how he can control a robotic arm and feel when the robotic hand is touched. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
President Barack Obama talks with Nathan Copeland, right, during a tour of innovation projects at the White House Frontiers Conference at University of Pittsburgh in Pittsburgh, Thursday, Oct. 13, 2016. Copeland demonstrates how he can control a robotic arm and feel when the robotic hand is touched. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
U.S. President Barack Obama gives a fist-bump to a robotic arm operated by Nathan Copeland, a quadriplegic brain implant patient who can experience the sensation of touch and control a remote robotic arm with his brain during a tour of the innovation projects at the White House Frontiers conference in Pittsburgh, U.S. October 13, 2016.  REUTERS/Carlos Barria
REUTERS
U.S. President Barack Obama gives a fist-bump to a robotic arm operated by Nathan Copeland, a quadriplegic brain implant patient who can experience the sensation of touch and control a remote robotic arm with his brain during a tour of the innovation projects at the White House Frontiers conference in Pittsburgh, U.S. October 13, 2016. REUTERS/Carlos Barria
Using a mind-controlled robotic arm, Nathan Copeland, a quadraplegic from Dunbar in Fayette County, share a fist bump with President Barack Obama, who was appearing in a panel discussion on the campus of Carnegie Mellon University during the tech-focused Frontiers Conference in Oakland, Thursday, Oct. 13, 2016.
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Using a mind-controlled robotic arm, Nathan Copeland, a quadraplegic from Dunbar in Fayette County, share a fist bump with President Barack Obama, who was appearing in a panel discussion on the campus of Carnegie Mellon University during the tech-focused Frontiers Conference in Oakland, Thursday, Oct. 13, 2016.

After two years of using a mind-controlled robotic arm, Nathan Copeland still struggles to describe some of the strange sensations that travel through the device to his brain.

The 30-year-old quadriplegic recognizes pressure, which usually is spread across distinct pads on his right palm. There's tingling. There's a kind of warmth, Copeland said, like “a shot of vodka, that warm but not like holding-a-cup-of-coffee warm.”

Then there's something he calls a “spidey sense,” a familiar sensation that is unlike any other he has felt and that he still can't describe.

The sensations come from four pads, half the size of shirt buttons, that a surgeon implanted in his brain above his left ear, the area responsible for movement and sensation in his right hand. The robotic hand sends electrical signals to the pads, each of which contains 60 to 100 pins connected to nerve cells, and the brain interprets the stimulation as touch.

“When we make them become active, the person experiences it as if his own hand has been touched,” said Robert Gaunt, an assistant professor of physical medicine and rehabilitation at the University of Pittsburgh who led a team of experts that developed the hand. The team, a partnership between Pitt and UPMC, published a study Thursday in Science Translational Medicine.

Although other robotic hands have transmitted the sense of touch by connecting the devices to peripheral nerves, Pitt's hand is different because it connects directly to the brain, said Elizabeth Tyler-Kabara, a study co-author who is a UPMC neurosurgeon and an assistant professor in the Department of Neurological Surgery at Pitt School of Medicine.

Copeland, of Dunbar in Fayette County, showed off the device Thursday during a meeting with President Obama in Pittsburgh during a White House Frontiers Conference celebrating technology.

The addition of touch comes about two years after Pitt researchers published a study in the Journal of Neural Engineering on their development of a mind-controlled arm. In that study, electrode panels implanted in quadriplegic Whitehall woman Jan Scheuermann's brain allowed her to move the arm but not feel what it touched.

Copeland lost sensation in his limbs at 18 when he broke his neck in a car accident while driving in the rain. He was a freshman at Penn State Fayette studying nanofabrication.

He's able to raise his right wrist, in the way someone accelerating on a motorcycle would, but is incapable of any other motion in the hand. He said he has sensation around his thumb, the side of his index finger and on a couple of fingertips. He agreed shortly after hospital admission to be contacted about clinical trials and started using the robotic arm in November 2014.

Researchers pinpointed brain areas associated with feeling in Copeland's hand by asking him to imagine certain feelings in his hand while his brain was being scanned, Gaunt said.

There were several things they didn't know going into the trial, including whether Copeland would be able to feel anything after 10 years without sensation, he said.

“We really didn't know what was going to happen or what it was going to feel like,” he said. “We were very happy that many of these electrodes felt like pressure, felt like touch.”

The study found the sensations of pressure in Copeland's hand could be graded for intensity and were stable for months. He cannot distinguish among textures. Gaunt hopes that could come in the future. For now, any feeling beyond basic tingling is an accomplishment, he said.

The study was funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's Revolutionizing Prosthetics program and by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship grant, according to a Pitt-UPMC news release.

Copeland makes an hour-and-twenty-minute drive three days each week for three- to four-hour sessions moving objects, identifying sensations and performing other tests with the hand. At the end of the study, which he expects to last four more years, he won't get to keep the hand.

That doesn't bother him, he said, because he believes he might be helping others like him in the future.

“This will probably be my biggest contribution to society,” he said. “So I get to feel like I'm doing something.”

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5676 or wventeicher@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.