ShareThis Page

Detroit-area mom jailed for not vaccinating 9-year-old son

| Wednesday, Oct. 4, 2017, 11:21 a.m.
Rebecca Bredow, of Michigan, faces possible jail time for refusing to obey a court order to have her 9-year-old son vaccinated.
WXYZ
Rebecca Bredow, of Michigan, faces possible jail time for refusing to obey a court order to have her 9-year-old son vaccinated.

PONTIAC, Mich. — A suburban Detroit woman was handcuffed Wednesday and sent to a jail for seven days for failing to follow an agreement to have her 9-year-old son vaccinated.

An Oakland County judge noted that Rebecca Bredow agreed to the immunization last November. Her ex-husband wanted their son vaccinated, but Bredow is the primary caregiver.

“I understand you love your children. But what I don't think you understand is that your son has two parents, and dad gets a say,” said Judge Karen McDonald, who found Bredow in contempt of court.

“It's clear to me that you don't care about orders even if you agree to them, which you did,” the judge said. “Your attorney signed that order.”

Bredow, a Ferndale resident, said she takes “full responsibility” for her actions. She said vaccinations go against her beliefs and she should have raised her objections sooner.

“I'm a passionate mother who cares deeply about my children, their health and their well-being. ... If my child was forced to be vaccinated, I couldn't bring myself to do it,” Bredow said.

The judge said Bredow has a history of making child-rearing decisions without consent from her ex-husband. McDonald granted temporary custody to him and ordered the boy to be properly vaccinated.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.