ShareThis Page

Expert: New blood pressure guidelines unrealistic

Ben Schmitt
| Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2017, 5:51 p.m.
(File photo | By Lillian DeDomenic  |  For Trib Total Media)
(File photo | By Lillian DeDomenic | For Trib Total Media)

The American Heart Association's new guidelines for high blood pressure are unrealistic, according to a local hypertension expert who suspects many other doctors share his opinion.

“I think it is quite impractical and might go so far to say impossible for physicians and patients to fully absorb and adhere to these guidelines,” Dr. Matthew Muldoon, director of the UPMC Heart and Vascular Institute Hypertension Center, told the Tribune-Review Tuesday. “I'm sure a lot of primary care doctors are saying, ‘Oh my gosh, are you kidding me?' I'm still in a little bit of shock myself.”

The new classification for high blood pressure — a top reading of 130 (systolic) and a bottom reading of 80 (diastolic) — replaces the former threshold of at least 140 over 90.

The change means an additional 14 percent of U.S. adults have high blood pressure, or 46 percent total versus 32 percent under the old levels.

“The folks who wrote the guidelines said it's worth it, but I'm challenged to understand whether they really wrapped their heads around the implications,” Muldoon said. “The existing guidelines were challenging enough for doctors and patients to try and adhere to.”

For example, a person who lost 15 pounds, exercised a few days a week and took medication in order to lower his or her blood pressure will now have to do more, or even take more medication.

“Any time guidelines like this change, it's a boom for drug companies,” Muldoon said. “The market just increased tremendously.”

Besides medication, which is fairly cheap and available in generic form, the recommended ways to lower blood pressure include losing weight, exercise, lowering sodium intake and reducing alcohol consumption.

Dr. Srinivas Murali, medical director of Allegheny Health Networks's Cardiovascular Institute, said the new guidelines should serve as a wake-up call to doctors and patients alike.

“I know it is going to be hard — no question about it,” he said of meeting the new threshold. “But I don't think as a medical community we have been aggressive enough in managing high blood pressure.”

After cigarette smoking, high blood pressure is the most significant risk factor for stroke and cardiovascular disease, Murali said.

“Being more aggressive in dealing with hypertension doesn't have to mean everybody is going to take two or three more medications,” he said. “Patients need to manage things like weight loss and salt intake. That's where the emphasis needs to be and it's an important lesson for all of us.”

Many doctors cite the so-called “DASH” diet as the most effective intervention in lowering blood pressure. The diet calls for eating fruits, vegetables and whole grains, and discourages foods high in saturated and total fats. DASH stands for Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension.

“There's a real problem with the western lifestyle,” said Dr. Thomas Pangburn, chief innovation officer for MedExpress, a network of walk-in clinics in Pennsylvania and other states. “The over-consumption of fast food, processed foods, simple sugars is a serious problem. This data and these guidelines reinforce that we need to take a lot of our lifestyle seriously and look at what modifications we can make.”

UPMC's Muldoon fully understands the importance of maintaining healthy blood pressures. Still, he expects a lot of tough conversations in doctors' offices in the next few weeks or months.

“We work so hard to get people below 140/90. Now we've got to say, ‘Hey, guess what? What was good enough is no longer enough?'” he said. “That's a hard message. Ten points is a lot. That may not sound like much but it is.”

Ben Schmitt is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7991, bschmitt@tribweb.com or via Twitter at @Bencschmitt.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.