Award honoring slain Pittsburgh officer given to IUP grad
A graduating student from Indiana University of Pennsylvania is the first recipient of the Stephen J. Mayhle Memorial Scholarship.
"Being the first person to get this is a great honor," said Patrick Lee, 22, who was presented with the scholarship award at commencement exercises on Saturday. More than 2,250 graduates were eligible to participate in IUP graduation ceremonies.
Stephen J. Mayhle was one of three officers killed in a Stanton Heights shootout with Richard Poplawski in April 2009. Officers Paul J. Sciullo II and Eric Kelly also were shot and killed.
Mayhle grew up in Indiana and was a graduate of IUP.
"This is really important for us. We are excited to award it. It is nice to have something good come out of a tragedy. This is a good way to honor his memory," said Randy Martin, chairman of IUP's criminology department, which has 1,000 students and is the largest single department at any state-owned university.
Mayhle's wife, Shandra, helped select the scholarship's recipient, according to Martin.
The scholarship was set up by the school and Downtown accounting firm KPMG, where employee Julie Duvall, a friend of the Mayhle family, helped create the award.
Lee, who was awarded $450, grew up in Uniontown and plans to work as a police officer in the Pittsburgh area. This summer, he will work as an officer in Bethany Beach, Del.
He was a student at IUP at the time of the Stanton Heights shootout and attended Mayhle's funeral.
"People really took it to heart when he was killed. Lots of the students felt connected because Mayhle was an IUP graduate and grew up in this town," Lee said.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.