Coroner: Indiana toddler likely died from drowning
An Indiana County mother performed CPR on her 13-month-old son on finding him face-down in a bathtub, authorities said on Sunday.
She could not revive the boy, Ryden Wesley A. Thomas Jr., and he was pronounced dead at 8:32 p.m. Saturday in Indiana Regional Medical Center.
Preliminary autopsy results were consistent with drowning, and there did not appear to be evidence of other trauma or physical abuse, county Coroner Michael Baker said.
Baker said Ryden was in the tub with two siblings, ages 2 and 3. He said the mother, identified by authorities as Tonya N. Thomas of Roush Drive, White Township, left the children for a few minutes while she attended to another matter. He did not say what she was doing.
Tonya Thomas contacted the Indiana County 911 center at 7:54 p.m. and performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation on Ryden until emergency medical services personnel from Citizens Ambulance Service arrived at the home, authorities said.
State police at Indiana said in a brief statement that they are investigating the circumstances leading up the boy's drowning.
Ryden also is survived by his father, Wesley Thomas; two brothers, Nevaeh G. and Aiden C. Thomas, at home; and two sisters, Alenah and Alyssia Thomas, both of New Alexandria.
Visitation will be from 2 to 4 and 7 to 8 p.m. Tuesday in Richard L. Shoemaker Funeral Home, Blairsville. A funeral service will be conducted at 8 p.m. Tuesday in the funeral home.
The family has asked that memorials be in the form of contributions to the funeral home to help pay for funeral expenses.
Mary Pickels is a staff writerfor Trib Total Media. She canbe reached at 724-836-5401 or firstname.lastname@example.org. Staff writerJoe Napsha contributed to this story.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.