Blairsville-Saltsburg school director asks for ethics probe of board operations
By Jeff Himler
Published: Thursday, Sept. 26, 2013, 8:55 p.m.
Blairsville-Saltsburg School Board member Holly Hall revealed last week that she has filed a request for the state ethics commission to look into the propriety of board voting, hiring and spending procedures she has called into question.
Reading a statement into the record near the end of the board's Sept. 18 meeting, Hall indicated she asked the ethics commission to focus on “specific issues.” But, following the meeting, she declined to discuss the specifics of her request, which she said she submitted two days earlier.
District Superintendent Tammy Whitfield declined to comment on Hall's remarks.
In her statement, Hall said, “I am troubled about specific issues that I have tried to address to this administration to no avail.... I find it necessary to ask the state ethics commission to provide me, the board and the public with an unbiased objective point of view regarding specific issues regarding how we deliberate, how we vote, how we spend money, how we employ and how ethical we are when it comes to operating this district.
“If I am wrong in my perceptions, I will apologize. If I am right, we owe the district an apology.”
Hall has voiced an opinion that district officials have violated the state's Sunshine Law by engaging in decision-making via such methods as e-mail correspondence rather than at a meeting open to the public.
Hall also said she feels. because of the opinions she's expressed, that she has been branded as a “trouble-maker” by many of her colleagues and administrators at the school district.
“I am troubled that board members are permitted to scream profanities, insults and make inflammatory accusations to and about those who disagree with them without proof or foundation. And the administration says nothing,” Hall stated.
Jeff Himler is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-459-6100, ext. 2910 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.