Indiana County man held in shooting, brother's assault
A 50-year-old Indiana County man is accused of shooting a man with a .22-caliber handgun and striking his brother in the head during an argument.
Kenneth A. Lobur of Penn Run was arraigned on Thursday before Homer City District Judge Susanne Steffee on charges of attempted homicide, aggravated assault, simple assault, reckless endangerment and harassment filed by state police in Indiana.
Trooper Scott Mackanick reported in an affidavit of probable cause that about 5 p.m. Wednesday, Lobur struck his brother, John J. Lobur Jr., 53, at the younger man's Jacobs Lane residence in Cherry Township, and John Lobur fell, suffering a cut on his head.
John Lobur returned to his adjoining residence and told Kevin R. Swegles, 57, about the altercation. Swegles told police he went to tell Kenneth Lobur he would drive John Lobur to Indiana Regional Medical Center when another argument started. Swegles alleges that Kenneth Lobur pulled a gun from beneath a bed and fired several shots, striking him once in the thigh.
Both men were treated at the hospital for non-life-threatening injuries, police said.
Mackanick reported there was a strong odor of alcohol on Kenneth Lobur when he questioned him.
The suspect told police the dispute involved rent money the elder Lobur claims he is owed by his brother.
Kenneth Lobur was ordered held in the Indiana County Jail when he failed to post $75,000 bail. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for Nov. 18.
Paul Peirce is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-850-2860 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.