Share This Page

Police: Wife tried to frame husband for porn

| Friday, Dec. 20, 2013, 9:31 p.m.

An Indiana County woman who blamed her estranged husband for placing images of child pornography on a home computer has been charged with creating those files and then lying to authorities about them, state police said.

Meri Jane Woods, 42, of Cherryhill Township started the investigation by the Southwest Computer Crime Task Force by going to the Indiana barracks on Aug. 14. She claimed her estranged husband had committed numerous criminal acts and had placed images of child pornography on the family computer, police said.

Cpl. John Roche said that a thorough examination of the computer revealed that all of the images of child pornography were written to the computer's hard drive on Aug. 11, according to a criminal complaint. Woods' husband told police he left the home on July 23 and never returned, the complaint said.

He was ordered out of the house under a protection-from-abuse order obtained by Meri Woods, police said.

She was charged with one felony count of sexual abuse of children for allegedly possessing a computer containing images of child pornography and 40 misdemeanor counts of unsworn falsification to authorities for allegedly accusing her husband of involuntary sexual deviate intercourse and sexual abuse of children.

Woods was arraigned on Thursday by Blairsville District Judge Jennifer Rega and released on $25,000 unsecured bond.

Joe Napsha is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-5252 or jnapsha@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.