Fire destroys maintenance building at Indiana gas well service company
A small maintenance building at an Indiana County company that services Marcellus and Utica shale natural gas wells was destroyed by a fire that set off several explosions on Tuesday morning, according to fire officials.
Five fire companies fought the blaze in the metal structure owned by Northeast Energy in White, which broke out just before 5 a.m., said fire Chief Charles Kelly of the Indiana Borough Volunteer Fire Department.
No company employees were on the site at the time, Kelly said, and no injuries were reported.
“When we first arrived on the scene, there was smoke coming out of every nook and cranny, but there were no visible flames,” Kelly said. “A little while later, flames broke through the roof.”
Firefighters initially stood back because they knew there were acetylene and oxygen tanks in the maintenance shop, and several of them exploded, Kelly said.
Firefighters drew water from a nearby pond to supplement the supply from a nearby fire hydrant, he said.
Hazmat was on the scene, a rural area along Route 954, between Routes 422 and 119.
Firefighters used excavation equipment to pull out the seared metal walls and extinguish hot spots so the flames would not reignite, Kelly said.
A tractor-trailer inside the building was destroyed. A small concrete-block office building on the property was not damaged.
A state police fire marshal will investigate the cause.
Paul Peirce is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.