Indiana County man charged in slaying
Charges have been filed in the New Year's Eve slaying of a gun shop owner in the Indiana County village of Tunnelton.
Jack O. Edmundson Jr., 43, of Saltsburg is charged with criminal homicide, attempted arson and aggravated assault in the death of Frank S. Petro, according to Indiana County District Attorney Patrick Dougherty.
Petro, 62, was shot and killed in his store — Frank's Gun & Taxidermy Shop — on Tuesday afternoon. An autopsy showed Petro suffered multiple gunshot wounds, said Indiana Deputy Coroner Jerry L. Overman Jr.
According to state police, surveillance video showed Edmundson enter the gun shop and remove a gun from a case. Seconds later, Petro emerged from a back room, and a confrontation ensued. Petro swiped at the gun and Edmundson, while backing up, fired two shots into the store owner's upper body.
The affidavit says Edmundson then poured black powder around the store and sprayed something out of a plastic bottle onto the floor. At one point, Petro got up and again confronted Edmundson. The shop owner was shot again, this time in the head or face.
Edmundson was wounded during the scuffle and is being treated in a Pittsburgh hospital, according to the district attorney.
Police said a news conference will be held on Thursday afternoon in the district attorney's office in Indiana.
In November, Edmundson was charged with unlawful restraint, false imprisonment, simple assault, disorderly conduct and harassment for allegedly posing as a police officer and handcuffing a teenager he accused of throwing corn at his car.
On Wednesday, at the Tunnelton Inn, about 1,000 feet from the gun shop, owner Kevin Nagg said Petro was a good friend “who would help you out any way he could.”
Nicole Chynoweth is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2862 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.