Pittsburgh: Check out why we must aid libraries
By Nafari Vanaski
Published: Thursday, March 14, 2013, 11:30 a.m.
After he read my column about the new school library at Manchester Pre-K-8 school, reader Bill V. wrote me an email in large font.
Among other things, he wrote: “Libraries always have and always should exist as the result of donation of materials and staffing by volunteers. If these are not present, then libraries should not exist.”
Spoken like the owner of a set of Encyclopedia Britannica, no doubt. It's an easy stance to take when you've never had to worry about access to books.
Another reader said I should have focused on the good of the Manchester situation — that volunteers stepped up to staff school libraries. She's right; it's selfless and it's great that someone is doing it.
But consider that the library existed with few books and broken shelves for a long time. There weren't enough volunteers then to help the thousands of children who must have graduated from that school thinking that no one cared enough about their corner of the world to fill or staff their library.
School libraries have not always depended on volunteers to keep them going, nor should they have to. There was a time when school funding went to libraries and full-time librarians. At my elementary school in Brooklyn, N.Y., the librarian, Mrs. Sacks, was sort of intimidating but she ensured our access to books.
So what has changed since then?
“Libraries have become expendable,” said Jessie Ramey, a history professor at the University of Pittsburgh who manages the website Yinzercation, a grassroots effort aimed at preventing further education budget cuts. Ramey said the $1 billion in cuts in the 2011-12 state budget caused school officials to make tough decisions about using the money they got.
“Some schools were forced to hire a first-grade teacher instead of a librarian,” Ramey said.
Ebony Pugh, spokeswoman for Pittsburgh Public Schools, said the district's high schools and schools serving grades 6-12 have full-time librarians.
Perhaps part of the reason libraries get short shrift is that many people don't understand the importance of a librarian. Sheila May-Stein, whose activism as a roving librarian for Pittsburgh Public Schools helped fill some of the spare shelves, said a full-time librarian can help support classroom curriculum by working with teachers.
A trained librarian is the only one who can check out a book to a student. That's why at Manchester, even with a revamped library, students typically can access it only twice a month.
A study by the nonprofit Education Law Center of Pennsylvania found that regardless of race, class or disability, students with access to a full-time librarian at school had higher state reading scores.
That sounds like, as the kids say today, kind of a big deal. Absent that, we'll have to continue to depend on the volunteers. Still, this situation begs the question: When schools can't afford to pay first-grade teachers, will we get volunteers for that, too?
Nafari Vanaski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8669 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.