Pa. liquor law quirks are eccentric
By Nafari Vanaski
Published: Thursday, March 14, 2013, 11:29 a.m.
Last year, for my (cough, cough) birthday, my sister in Oregon thought it would be a good idea to mail me a wine gift basket. That was a good idea, and a gift I would have appreciated. But my grandmother, er, Pennsylvania government, said otherwise.
Every time my sister tried to complete her online order, her purchase was blocked because she did not realize it is illegal to ship liquor to Pennsylvania. When she told me about this later, that's when I realized just how antiquated Pennsylvania's liquor laws are.
But Gov. Tom Corbett's plan to privatize liquor sales in the state would take care of some of that. It would make it possible to walk into grocery stores, pharmacies or big-box stores and buy beer or wine, bringing Pennsylvania in line with other states that have had this for years.
This plan to step into at least the 20th century, though, is meeting resistance because of some loose ends, mostly involving the future employment of the state store workers and beer distributors, who would find themselves a lot less busy.
You hate to see people lose their jobs, but that's not reason enough to allow the state to hold onto an outdated system that tends to make buyers feel as though you're buying alcohol from your grandparents, who disapprove of your drinking. Meanwhile, the state figures it should monopolize the whole industry so you at least drink responsibly while it reaps the benefits.
There are some other quirks to the state liquor codes that could use re-examination as well. For example, you can't drink until you're 21, but you can serve other people drinks if you're 18. Then there's the concept left over from Prohibition of “dry” towns, such as Bellevue, where you can't buy liquor but you can bring a bottle to a restaurant.
The state store system limits liquor sales to a few stores with shorter hours on Sundays — if they're open — while bars are allowed to remain open. This one's a particular favorite, because although the law limits someone's ability to buy a bottle of vodka on a Sunday, she might end up driving while intoxicated anyway after leaving a bar.
That's also illegal — for those keeping score — and is probably a bigger threat to public safety than petrifying your liver in the privacy of your home.
Did you know it's illegal to make or sell sweets containing alcohol in Pennsylvania? It's part of something called the Pure Foods Act, which is ironic in a country that allows the sale of animal intestines in any old supermarket. It seems as though the state's job is to keep us from enjoying the simple things.
The state Liquor Control Board spends 4 percent of its proceeds on administrative, licensing and legal costs and alcohol education, which includes treatment for addiction.
So of the nearly $2 billion in state liquor sales in the 2011-12 fiscal year, only about $84 million went to the aforementioned expenses. And only a portion of that amount went for education for a substance that's kept under lock and key — unless you get it from the state.
Talk about mixed-drink signals.
Nafari Vanaski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8669, or firstname.lastname@example.org or on Twitter @NafariTrib.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.