ShareThis Page

$90K FEMA grant to help SouthBridge EMS

| Saturday, Aug. 27, 2016, 2:42 p.m.

SouthBridge EMS will be able to replace four heart monitors, thanks to a federal grant worth $90,000.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency's Assistance to Firefighters Grant includes a $9,000 contribution that SouthBridge EMS must make. SouthBridge operations manager Dan Miller said the organization's bid proposal for the full amount was approved.

“It was a welcome surprise,” Miller said.

He said SouthBridge EMS officials have two bids they are reviewing for the monitors.

The organization has seven monitors that are used in the ambulances and a response vehicle.

“They are functional, but the company advised us that they will no longer service them,” Miller said.

The organization is working on replacing the other three monitors, he said.

SouthBridge EMS is a private, nonprofit organization that has a membership drive and donation drive. Money from the membership drive is used for patient services. The donation drive is geared toward capital equipment such as the monitors, Miller said.

Most of the SouthBridge staff is paid. The organization is the designated EMS provider for Bridgeville, Cecil and South Fayette. SouthBridge responds to an average of 4,600 requests for service a year, according to its website.

Jim Spezialetti is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-388-5805 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.