ShareThis Page

Gateway achievement gap panel formulates 1-school pilot plan

Emily Balser
| Tuesday, Aug. 30, 2016, 4:45 p.m.

The Gateway School Board's achievement gap committee is nearing its end as it compiles its final proposal to submit to the full school board for a vote.

The committee has been meeting since May to try to develop a plan to address achievement of all students and the achievement gap between black and white students.

The committee developed a three-year pilot program plan that would focus on one school to determine if the initiatives are successful, before implementing district-wide changes.

The pilot program includes using culturally responsive teaching methods, creating an “equity team” and goals for that team, providing diversity training for teachers and conducting an outreach program for parents. The pilot school hasn't been determined yet, but would be chosen based on the school with the highest number of underperforming students.

The committee decided to take the pilot-program approach to make it easier for the board and district to get used to such measures, as well as to reduce the cost.

“There's a lot of people that have to buy into this,” said school board member Steve O'Donnell, who heads the committee.

O'Donnell also cautioned the committee about the budgeting system the board has adopted, which requires a detailed breakdown of all costs in the pilot program before the board will consider funding it.

“It's about allocation of resources,” O'Donnell said.

The equity team will likely be the most costly part of the program. The committee discussed the team having up to four people who would act as consultants and provide feedback and recommendations for the pilot school on how to address the achievement gap and diversity.

Teacher and committee member Epryl King said that could cost $150,000 to $300,000. A total cost for the pilot program hasn't been determined.

King also stressed the need for culturally responsive teaching as the main component of the program because of its success in closing achievement gaps between white and black students in other schools. Culturally responsive teaching involves using the cultural characteristics and perspectives of ethnically diverse students as conduits for learning.

“The research does point to (the success of) CRT,” King said.

The district will also continue to align its curriculum to state standards to improve its students' achievement, which is a goal of new Superintendent Bill Short.

Short said no matter what direction the committee takes with its initiatives, the district will continue to have targeted accelerated growth classes for underperforming students. Those classes are a double period of one subject and targeted to students' specific needs. The district will also continue to offer after-school tutoring programs.

The achievement gap committee will meet one more time before sending the pilot-program proposal to the board this fall. That meeting has not yet been scheduled.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.