A Somerset County man who allegedly solicited donations fraudulently from businesses, claiming they would benefit a state police youth program, is being sought by police.
David Wayne Brant, 46, of Meyersdale is charged with theft by deception in connection with several incidents, including one in Meyersdale, on Saturday, state police said.
Brant requested donations for the nonprofit Camp Cadet of Somerset County, an agency that does not solicit door to door or by telephone, Trooper Christopher P. Allen said.
“Legitimate Camp Cadet of Somerset County donation solicitations are made yearly via a mailer,” Allen said in a news release.
“The Camp Cadet of Somerset County Association is deeply troubled by this incident, and we hope that this does not cast a shadow on the overwhelming support we receive from the public every year for an extremely worthwhile and positively life-altering endeavor,” he said.
Allen asked that any business or individual who was solicited by Brant on behalf of Camp Cadet contact him at 814-445-4104.
The annual weeklong camp for county youth ages 13 to 15 is held each July at Outdoor Odyssey at Roaring Run.
Participants learn state police patrol responsibilities including criminal investigation and forensics, first aid/CPR and weapon safety. Program highlights include presentations by the Secret Service, the FBI and state Game Commission officers.
Cadets also participate in physical training and team-building exercises.
Mary Pickels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-5401 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.