2 men charged with vandalizing trail bridge
Officers with the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources have charged two Westmoreland County men with vandalizing the Laurel Highlands Hiking Trail Bridge in Somerset County.
James Cameron, 25, and Jacob W. Bradshaw, 26, both of Stahlstown, were charged with knocking down and driving over a gate on the northern side of the bridge, then driving through a large section of chain link fence on the southern side of the bridge that crosses the Pennsylvania Turnpike near Somerset.
The Aug. 30 incident resulted in more than $5,000 worth of damage, according to state officials.
The pair were arraigned on charges of criminal mischief, reckless driving, trespassing and violation of government traffic rules before Confluence District Judge Sandra L. Stevanus.
The charges were filed by Chief Ranger Jeremy Peck of Laurel Hill State Park.
The bridge is owned by the Bureau of State Parks and is part of the Laurel Highlands Hiking Trail, a 70-mile corridor running north and south through state park lands and Forbes State Forest.
The bridge crosses the turnpike about midway between the Somerset and Donegal exits. It was reopened January 2012 after a $1.3 million reconstruction project to replace a nearly 40-year-old span that had become unsafe.
Preliminary hearings are scheduled Oct. 17 before Stevanus.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.