ShareThis Page

Cathedral peregrine finds new beau

Mary Ann Thomas
| Friday, March 25, 2016, 11:49 a.m.
Hope the peregrine falcon, formerly a nester under the Tarentum Bridge, is seen at the nesting box atop the University of Pittsburgh's Cathedral of Learning in Oakland.
Courtesy of National Aviary falcon cam at the University of Pittsburgh
Hope the peregrine falcon, formerly a nester under the Tarentum Bridge, is seen at the nesting box atop the University of Pittsburgh's Cathedral of Learning in Oakland.

A new beau has come a-courtin' Hope, the peregrine falcon nesting at the Cathedral of Learning in Pittsburgh.

Hope — widowed suddenly last week — could in one fell swoop cease being a single mom and become part of a new couple with its own brood.

That depends on nature taking its course with Hope and a new young male peregrine. The pair have been spotted flying and mating at the University of Pittsburgh's skyscaper this week, much to the delight of peregrine watchers.

With luck, Hope might be laying eggs in two weeks. Those new eggs will blend with her other three eggs laid from her late mate, E2, who likely was hit by a car.

“It's drama — it's peregrines,” said Kate St. John, of Pittsburgh, the longtime monitor of the seven pairs of Pittsburgh peregrine falcons currently nesting in the greater Pittsburgh area. “They live fast — and they are the fastest animal on earth.”

The birds remain on Pennsylvania's endangered species list.

It's happened before: Young from two different couples were raised in 2010 at the Gulf Tower in downtown Pittsburgh. When Dori the peregrine ousted Tasha, she incubated two of Tasha's eggs and three of her own with Louie, Tasha's ex. All five young fledged in the nest.

Besides wooing Hope, the new falcon is asserting himself, defending territory around the cathedral. He bopped a resident red-tailed hawk twice Thursday, relegating the less-dynamic raptor to lower airspace.

“He is a gent who is really energetic,” St. John said.

He'll have to be to keep up with Hope, who has quite the backstory. She spent a number of years living in the superstructure of the Tarentum Bridge, where she raised two sets of young.

But Hope lost her latest mate early in 2015. She was seen spending time with a new, very young mate.

But she apparently had bigger plans and got her opportunity: Dorothy, the elderly, long-reigning Cathedral queen — and mother of 43 — went missing early last November. She likely is deceased.

E2 started advertising for a new mate and Hope showed up on the live webcam of the Cathedral of Learning nest, called a “scrape,” on Nov. 30.

The two courted, flying together and displaying other romantic gestures such as when E2 brought a meal to Hope at the scrape.

But there was a female peregrine still showing up at the Tarentum Bridge at the same time believed, but not confirmed to be, Hope.

“She could have been playing both at a time, going from spending most of the time at Pitt, where she is now clearly committed,” said Art McMorris, peregrine coordinator for the Pennsylvania Game Commission.

Hope made the permanent leap to the Cathedral of Learning and bonded more with E2, who died as Hope was laying three of their eggs.

“Hope has been in the business of attracting a mate,” St. John said. “Now she is at a prime nesting site and attracting a mate is not difficult.”

Better yet, Hope can delay incubating her eggs from E2 for weeks, so there's a good chance that with new eggs with her new beau, all will likely be viable, McMorris said.

Additionally, it's early enough in season for Hope to lay another clutch of eggs as many of the state's peregrine don't have eggs yet.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4691 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.