Unlocked gate aided Washington County duo's escape from Greene County Prison
Two inmates escaped from the Greene County Prison by walking through an unlocked gate and climbing atop a picnic table to scale the fence, the warden said on Thursday.
Jason William Roe, 33, of Daisytown in Washington County, who is awaiting trial on a homicide charge, and Rocco John Iacovone, 27, of Washington, who is awaiting trial for robbery, escaped on Saturday but were captured about two hours later, Warden Harry D. Gillispie said in a statement.
A tower guard, following prison policy, fired a warning shot at the men as they fled about 12:30 p.m. while prisoners were outside for recreation, Gillispie said. No one was injured.
“The men were able to escape after a corrections officer failed to secure a gate separating the prison's main recreation yard from a minimum-security yard,” Gillispie said.
As the prisoners were escorted into the yard, Roe and Iacovone went through the gate and picked up an inmate water cooler. The guard spotted them and ordered them back into the main yard.
Instead, the warden said, they dropped the water cooler, ran to the back of the minimum-security yard and upended a wooden picnic table to scale a service gate, squeezing between the top of the gate and the row of razor wire above. They were caught less than a mile away from the prison.
The prison made changes to ensure such a escape does not happen again, Gillispie said.
Officials also will try to implement an emergency alert system to notify the public about emergencies at the facility.
Michael Hasch is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7820 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.