Eighty Four man convicted of trying to hide purchases made by drug sale cash
By The Tribune-Review
Published: Friday, July 19, 2013, 4:54 p.m.
An Eighty Four man who paid cash for a pickup truck, a front end loader, a tractor and two houses deliberately structured the purchases to avoid questions about where the money came from, a federal jury decided Friday after deliberating two hours following a weeklong trial.
Daniel Young, 42, kept the transactions under the $10,000 reporting limit because the money came from his drug dealing, prosecutors say. The jury convicted him of conspiracy and structuring financial transactions.
Young is serving 12 to 24 years after his conviction in June 2011 on cocaine trafficking charges in Washington County, prosecutors say.
U.S. District Judge David Cercone scheduled Young's sentencing for Dec. 4. The jury agreed that the vehicles and property as well as about $235,000 were connected to the crime and subject to confiscation by the government.
Two other people are charged with participating in the financial structuring.
Kimberly Ostrander, 49, of Wind Ridge is scheduled to plead guilty July 24. Dennis Young, 47, of Monongahela pled guilty to criminal conspiracy and is scheduled to be sentenced Nov. 1.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.