Bentleyville man accused of swiping dozens of utility lines
A wire casing on the ground outside a Washington County home led Southwest Regional police to a man now accused of clipping copper ground wires to more than 80 electric utility poles in Bentleyville.
Cory Wayne Thomas George, 22, of Bentleyville is charged with criminal mischief, theft and receiving stolen property for allegedly removing ground wires to “nearly every utility pole in the borough,” according to police officer Stephen T. Schwartz.
A copper casing was found near his back porch, according to police.
“We did have some advance information that (George) may have been involved, but he did eventually confess,” police Chief John Hartman said Monday.
Officials at First Energy, the company that owns the poles, told police that no outages were caused by the thefts, which occurred between June 27 and July 1.
“But First Energy officials did say it could have eventually caused major problems,” Hartman said.
George sold the copper at Ritenour's Auto Wrecking in Ellsworth for approximately $140, Schwartz stated in an affidavit filed before Ellsworth District Judge Curtis Thompson.
George can be seen on surveillance video selling the copper at the business, police said.
First Energy officials told police it cost more than $1,160 to replace the ground lines.
A preliminary hearing will be scheduled before Thompson.
Paul Peirce is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-850-2860 .
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.