South Strabane policeman to run for state House in 15th
South Strabane police Officer John Bruner announced this week that he is running against state Rep. Jim Christiana, a Beaver County Republican whose district has grown to include parts of Washington County.
Bruner, 42, of Buffalo Township is running as a Democrat in the 15th District, which expanded beyond Beaver County in the recent redistricting to include portions of western Washington County. It now covers parts or all of nine Beaver County municipalities and 15 Washington County municipalities.
A former detective for the Greene County District Attorney's Office and a negotiator with the Washington County regional SWAT team, Bruner consults with businesses on how to prepare for and react to robberies and shootings.
He said he is a leasehol-der with Range Resources but supports revisiting the state's oil and gas laws to study applying a severance tax on gas wells.
If elected, Bruner said he or a member of his staff would attend at least 50 municipal, school board or charter meetings a year so he could monitor constituents' concerns.
Christiana said he intends to seek a fourth term. Nominating petitions for the May 20 primary begin circulating next week, he said.
Matthew Santoni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5625 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Add Matthew Santoni to your Google+ circles.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.