Cecil 'on hook' to update sewer lines in Lawrence
A gas grill that Andrew Boyd bought a decade ago stands inside his garage — unused.
“In the summertime, you can't have a cookout because of the smell,” said Boyd, 77, a resident of Lawrence, a former coal community on the edge of Cecil in northern Washington County. “You have to keep your windows closed.”
The smell comes from a system of wildcat sewer lines used by most of the about 300 homes in Lawrence. At least eight such lines flow into Chartiers Creek, including one that opens onto a hillside across from Boyd's house.
Cecil commissioners last week voted to hire a grant writer to pursue $2.2 million in casino taxes to extend public sewer lines to Lawrence. Officials estimate the project, discussed for decades, will cost $6 million and take four years to complete.
“They've needed this probably for 20 years,” said Tom Casciola, president of Cecil's board of supervisors.
The township has committed $1 million to the project, as has its municipal authority. Almost $2 million will be raised through $1,500 tap-in fees to be paid by residents, Casciola said.
The remaining money is being sought through a Local Share Assessment grant, collected from table-game revenue at The Meadows Racetrack & Casino in North Strabane. Township officials are looking into the availability of federal money, Casciola said.
Because the township filed a plan under Act 537, the state law that requires municipalities to correct and prevent sewage disposal problems, it must follow through with fixing Lawrence's longstanding problem — regardless of whether state or federal funding comes through, Casciola said. “We're on the hook for it now,” he said. “We pulled the trigger. There's no turning back.”
In urging fellow supervisors to support paying a grant writer, Casciola said he received assurance from state Sen. Tim Solobay that the Canonsburg Democrat would support the effort as his “pet project.”
Casciola later said he regretted using the phrase, which drew criticism on social media from state Rep. Jesse White, D-Cecil.
“There's no guarantees, but he promised to help us,” Casciola said of Solobay. “Maybe the word ‘pet' was a poor choice.”
Solobay said he would write a support letter to be included with the grant application.
“You've got raw sewage running down the streets in Lawrence. That is something that needs to be addressed,” Solobay said. He called White's criticism “typical, political garbage.”
White last year took heat for blasting gas-drilling opponents online by using aliases, including one that parodied Solobay.
White posted his recent comments under his name and said he responded to a Facebook post about the “pet project” comment.
“I was shocked,” White said. “That ‘pet project' thing just isn't how things are supposed to work.”
White said he supports the Lawrence project and offered the free use of a staff grant writer to save the township money.
“I want to help. It's my job,” White said. “We can make these projects happen for people, but we have to work together.”
Casciola, who lost to White in the May Democratic primary for his House seat, questioned whether White's involvement would help.
Despite their differences, Solobay said he would welcome White's assistance.
“At the end of the day, we want to make sure our communities have what they need to grow, in terms of infrastructure and public safety,” Solobay said.
Boyd said the sewer lines are needed, regardless of who facilitates the work.
“If it rains or not, you can hear water running,” Boyd said, standing near a trickling street drain. “That's from everything — sewer water, dishwater, laundry. The whole block flows through.”
Jason Cato is a Trib Total Media staff writer. Reach him at 412-320-7936.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.