ShareThis Page

Pa. investigators struggle to build drug death cases

Renatta Signorini
| Wednesday, Aug. 17, 2016, 11:00 p.m.
The Drug Enforcement Agency has stepped up efforts in Western Pennsylvania to track dealers in fatal overdose cases.
TRIBUNE-REVIEW FILE PHOTO
The Drug Enforcement Agency has stepped up efforts in Western Pennsylvania to track dealers in fatal overdose cases.

After his 28-year-old son died of a heroin overdose in 2013, Greg King looked to his cellphone for clues.

The West Newton man transcribed text messages that Adam King had sent and received, hoping police could figure out who had sold him the fatal dose.

“At the time, I definitely wanted to find out who he got the heroin from,” said King, who said he was blind-sided by the death of his son, who loved the outdoors. “Adam was the kind of person you wanted to be around. He and I were very close, and we talked all the time about drugs and alcohol.”

But investigators told him tracking down the supplier would be difficult.

“That just became very frustrating to me,” he said.

A similar scene plays daily in Pennsylvania, where overdoses are at epidemic levels. Few of the dealers who have sold fatal doses have been held accountable. Investigators say overdose deaths are difficult to unravel and, even when a suspect is identified, there's rarely enough evidence to file charges.

Between 2011 and 2015, 115 cases of drug delivery resulting in death made it to trial, according the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts. In 2014 and 2015, overdoses killed 6,125 people in the state, the Drug Enforcement Administration wrote in a recent report.

The number of drug delivery cases filed has increased each year — from four in 2011 to 41 in 2015 — and led prosecutors to try various tactics, according to Richard Long, director of the Pennsylvania District Attorneys Association.

“We're trying to fight this on multiple fronts,” Long said. “District attorneys are looking at where these drugs are coming from, especially with the law change.”

Before 2011, prosecutors in the state had to prove that a drug supplier intended for the user to die to secure a conviction on a drug delivery resulting in death charge. That year, lawmakers amended the statute to eliminate the requirement to show intent.

The charge can be prosecuted as a third-degree homicide, which carries a maximum penalty of 20 to 40 years in prison.

Westmoreland County District Attorney John Peck has authorized the filing of eight cases. Authorities in only three other counties — Cumberland, York and Dauphin — have filed more cases.

Few of those cases have been resolved. In 2014 and 2015, 14 people were sentenced on the charge.

In January, Peck secured Westmoreland's first drug delivery-death conviction during a trial. Michael Ulysses Peterson, 42, was sentenced in June to eight to 16 years in prison in connection with his cousin's overdose death.

Challenges in charges

Between 2012 and 2015, 377 people died of overdoses in Westmoreland County, according to coroner statistics. On average, one person died every three days last year. Charges have been brought in just four of those deaths.

The disparity hasn't daunted Peck, who last year decided to send county detectives to every overdose death to collect evidence of how the victims got the drugs.

“The number of these was too great to not investigate,” he said.

Autopsies can be a stumbling block if the victim had more than one drug in his or her system, Peck said. Toxicology results show that most of the 126 people who died of overdoses in Westmoreland in 2015 had used more than one substance, coroner statistics show.

And prosecutors must be able to connect a suspect to the specific deadly drug dose.

“That cannot always be the easiest connection to make,” Peck said.

Rachele Amodeo of Hempfield said she knew who sold her 18-year-old son, Jonathan Morelli, a fatal dose of heroin in February 2013. But there wasn't enough evidence to bring charges.

“It was very frustrating,” said Amodeo.

The investigation into Morelli's death was thorough, she said.

“The police were wonderful with trying to figure out can they do something,” she said. “I tried, and I know the police tried.”

Complex problem

The charge is a tool in battling the drug epidemic, but authorities said it's not the ultimate solution. Peck's office has distributed the overdose antidote Narcan to municipal police departments and collected thousands of pounds of unused prescription medications.

“I think people understand ... that dealing in drugs resulting in a drug death can have serious consequences for the seller,” Peck said.

But for the families of overdose victims, those sentences are few and far between, said county Detective Tony Marcocci.

“Family members typically want someone to be held accountable,” he said.

Criminal charges against Adam King's supplier wouldn't erase the pain, but it could prevent someone else from the same fate, Greg King said. The investigation into his son's death might have yielded more if a county detective had been sent to the scene, he said.

“I think that's a good thing,” he said. “At the time, I had no idea my son was using heroin.”

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.