Police use Taser on driver of car in Vandergrift chase
State police said they stopped a wild chase by driving into the side of the suspect's car and then using a Taser on the driver.
Michael Potts, 38, recently of New Kensington, is accused of driving through stops signs near Kennedy Park at about 7:40 p.m. Sunday, police said.
Potts is also wanted for driving without a license and for arrest warrants including one for alleged domestic abuse and allegedly not making all payments in a domestic case, police said.
Potts is accused of speeding away instead of stopping for the flashing lights on an unmarked state police car.
Cpl. Christopher Teranna said Potts led police on a 7- to 10-minute high-speed chase around Kennedy Park, down to Route 66 and back up around the park three times at speeds reaching 60 mph.
"It got to the point that people were coming out on their porches to watch. I was concerned about public safety and the chase needed to end," Teranna said.
Teranna said he was able to bump the left side of the car driven by Potts.
The bump caused Potts' car to slam into a parked vehicle near the intersection of Walnut and Oak streets.
State police and Vandergrift officers scrambled to grab Potts and he resisted when police tried to pull him out of the driver's window. Teranna used a Taser to subdue him, the trooper said.
Potts is charged with fleeing or attempting to elude police, reckless endangerment, resisting arrest, disorderly conduct and driving while his license is suspended or revoked.
He was arraigned Sunday night and was in the Westmoreland County Prison Monday in lieu of $35,500 combined bond pending a preliminary hearing.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.