Technology upgrade earmarked for Westmoreland courts
Westmoreland County's 11 courtrooms are getting a technical makeover.
County commissioners on Thursday approved spending more than $35,000 to upgrade the audio-visual equipment in the courts, replacing technology that is more than 15 years old.
The county will purchase big-screen, high-definition televisions, stands, support equipment and evidence presenters that will project images and videos to jurors.
“This will improve the courtrooms and our ability to present evidence in all of our courtrooms,” said Court Administrator Paul Kuntz.
The county purchased about four evidence presenters in the mid-1990s that were moved on carts between courtrooms during trial terms. Older, bulky television sets were rotated among courtrooms.
Now, each courtroom will have at least three television sets and an evidence presenter permanently installed.
The county will use money from its Record Improvement Fund, which is cash collected from filings and fees assessed in row offices, such as the Clerk of Court and Prothonotary offices.
As of July 31, the fund had more than $184,000 in reserve.
Clerk of Courts Bryan Kline, who serves as chairman of the county's Records Improvement Committee, said that since 1998, the fund has doled out more than $1.4 million for upgrades. This year, more than $54,000 has been added to the fund.
“None of it is taxpayer money,” Kline said.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.