No tax increase anticipated in Ligonier
A preliminary budget with no tax increase was presented to Ligonier Borough Council members Thursday night.
Council raised taxes 1 mill last year to 23.5 mills. One mill brings in about $17,000 to the borough.
Council members took no action on the proposed budget Thursday night, but will vote on it at next month's council meeting, set for 7 p.m. Dec. 13.
Although the $1.1 million budget is very similar to last year's, the borough was able to find a 34 percent savings by switching borough employees' health insurance from Highmark to UPMC, said finance committee chairman Bob Bell.
An additional 4 percent was saved by joining the Central Westmoreland Councils of Government. That group brings municipalities together to jockey for bulk discounts in supplies, equipment and insurance coverage.
Council members next month will discuss an increase in parking fines in hopes of adding $16,200 in revenue for the borough.
Bell said he didn't know the extent of the increase.
In years past, the borough has generated between $42,000 and $51,000 in revenue from paid parking fines. Currently, motorists are charged $5 for an expired meter and more for other violations.
In addition, an extra $18,000 was budgeted for Town Hall roof repairs.
The budget is available for public inspection in Town Hall for the next month.
Jewels Phraner is a reporter for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-1218 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.