Hempfield health care costs continue to rise
By Richard Gazarik
Published: Saturday, Dec. 8, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Hempfield taxpayers will spend $580,000 next year to pay for health care for retired employees — including former supervisors and their wives who were awarded lifetime health care benefits after a decision by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in 2009.
The figure is part of $1.5 million budgeted for health care in the proposed 2013 budget, which is to be adopted later this month. Despite the payouts, Hempfield has not needed to raise taxes next year. It will mark 25 years since the township last had a tax increase.
For 2013, supervisors allotted $2 million to pay for health insurance, life and disability insurance, and retirement, according to the proposed budget.
Health care for administrative employees will cost nearly $231,000 next year, up from more than $126,000 this year.
More than $615,000 will cover health care for employees of the public works department. Current costs are nearly $538,000.
Retirement contributions will eat up another $322,000 next year, although that is $7,100 less than this year.
The cost of health care for retired supervisors, who were employed by the township as roadmasters or as a township secretary, touched off a legal battle that led to a favorable ruling for the township in Commonwealth Court.
That ruling was later overturned by the state Supreme Court.
In 2011, the board of supervisors approved settlements with former supervisors who are receiving township-paid health care for the rest of their lives. They received life insurance coverage and were reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred while the case was pending.
When the township negotiated a contract with union employees years ago, they awarded the workers lifetime benefits when they retired. Township auditors later awarded the same benefits to supervisors who were employed by the township.
The settlements ended a long-running legal dispute over whether the former supervisors were entitled to lifetime health care benefits. Township employees, who were union members, were eligible for lifetime benefits when they had five years of employment with Hempfield and reached age 55.
Supervisors sued to stop the payments to former supervisors, arguing they never were approved by the board.
The legal case that triggered the Hempfield dispute originated in White Deer Township, Union County, in 2004 when officials adopted an ordinance that awarded lifetime benefits to supervisors and their families just before they retired.
The township challenged the law in court and lost.
Hempfield had a practice that allowed elected supervisors to take paid jobs as roadmasters or as township secretary while they were in office.
That practice has since been abolished.
Richard Gazarik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6292 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Wilkinsburg man jailed in heroin overdose case
- Judge to Cook Township drug suspect: Get new friends
- Mt. Pleasant’s St. Pius X serves up Lenten meals
- Westmoreland man’s walk in Niagara Falls State Park wasn’t allowed, police say
- Greensburg Salem raising funds for fitness equipment
- Homicide charge added in Derry death
- Pittsburgh man charged with threat to witness
- Murrysville police will get raises in 5-year pact
- Vets share stories for St. Vincent oral history project
- Mt. Pleasant board to vote on contract with Volz
- Safety council honors mail carrier hours before milk truck wrecks Hempfield home