Donegal Township holds line on taxes
Donegal Township real estate owners will not see a tax increase in 2013.
Supervisors approved a balanced budget this week that keeps the rate at 4 mills. Both revenues and expenditures are set at $646,112.
Supervisor Tom Stull Jr. said the millage rate hasn't been increased since the mid-1990s, when it went up 1 mill.
During public comment, businessman Bill Steele asked supervisors if they could do something about a mandate by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources , which prohibits trucks used for Steele's business to travel on old Route 31, a road that runs through state lands.
In the past, delivery trucks for Steele that were coming from Somerset would get off Route 31 at old Route 31 to get onto Camp Run Road and back to Steele's business.
Both of the intersections along this route are wide enough for the trucks to make the turns, he said. Now the trucks have to travel farther down Route 31 and turn directly onto Camp Run Road. Unfortunately, the opening onto Camp Run Road is not big enough for the trucks to make a clean turn, he said.
Steele asked supervisors if widening the opening is a possibility.
Supervisors agreed to call a meeting with the DCNR, Rep. Mike Reese, Sen. Richard Kasunic and PennDOT officials to see what can be done.
In other business, supervisors said no to a request from Champion Christian School officials to sell or give a right-of-way to the organization for a second entrance.
PennDOT officials would probably not approve such action anyhow, they said.
Rachel Basinger is a freelance writer.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.