Latrobe woman, 80, pleads guilty to fatal car crash
An 80-year-old Latrobe woman pleaded guilty on Friday for causing a car crash more than two years ago that killed her best friend.
Carolyn Boerio was sentenced by Westmoreland County Judge Rita Hathaway to serve five years on probation and have her driver's license suspended for seven years — four years longer than state law requires — as a result of the fatal crash on Aug. 28, 2010.
Police said Boerio was traveling on Route 130 in Cook Township when she drove through a stop sign as she turned onto Route 711 in Stahlstown.
Boerio's car hit a sport utility vehicle driven by Matthew Carter of Verona. Carter and his three children were uninjured, police said.
But Janice Massimino, 66, of Latrobe, who was seated in the front passenger's seat of Boerio's car, died from her injuries. Boerio was injured, according to police.
Boerio's only comment in court yesterday was that she pleaded guilty because it was in her best interest to do so.
“The person who died was her longtime best friend, and she feels horrible about what happened. It's really something that has weighed on her since it first happened,” defense attorney Michael DeMatt said.
Boerio pleaded guilty to a felony charge of vehicular homicide, a misdemeanor count of involuntary manslaughter and four charges of reckless endangerment.
Assistant District Attorney Pete Flanigan said the sentence was crafted to ensure that Boerio does not drive again until she is cleared to do so by PennDOT.
“There are concerns over her ability to drive safely and that prompted the decision to suspend her license beyond the mandatory three years,” Flanigan said.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.