Apparent prankster preys on widows listed in obituaries
A man apparently used obituaries to carry out what Greensburg police called a “disheartening” and “ill-advised” prank on two recently widowed women during the past two weeks.
A male caller phoned one of the widows on Dec. 15 and the second on Sunday, claiming to have one of the victim's relatives tied up in a room near him, police said.
“It's extremely disheartening to see these kind of things happening, and we're going to do what we can for a quick prosecution,” police Chief Walter “Wally” Lyons said on Monday.
Money doesn't appear to be the motivation for the calls, he said.
“It seems to be more of a prank, an ill-advised prank, than some type of extortion, because there was no request for money,” Lyons said.
“To put more stress on a grieving person is beyond the pale,” he added.
A woman living in the city's 8th Ward received a call about 8:30 a.m. Sunday. The caller said he had the woman's sister-in-law tied up in a nearby room.
The woman hung up immediately and called police, who discovered the relative was safe.
On Dec. 15, a man called a woman living in the 2nd Ward about 9:40 a.m. and said he had the woman's daughter in another room. The man said he had strip-searched the daughter and tied her up.
The woman receiving the call asked where the man was calling from, and he hung up, police said.
The daughter was found to be safe, police said.
Anyone receiving such a call should contact police immediately, Lyons said.
Greensburg police plan to contact other local police departments to find out whether they are investigating similar calls, Lyons said.
At a minimum, the caller could face a charge of harassment by communication.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.