Westmoreland County program to collect fines, restitution to expand
Administrative hearings for criminal defendants who owe court costs and restitution payments will increase in 2013.
Clerk of Courts Bryan Kline said on Tuesday that his year-old program to collect cash for the court system brought in an additional $600,000 last year.
“It's generating revenue for the county and for victims. Victims are the main focus here because they need to be made whole again,” Kline said.
Kline's office, in addition to keeping all criminal court records, is responsible for collecting court costs, fines and restitution payments.
Last year Kline initiated a system in which he summoned defendants who have missed payments to a hearing before him at the courthouse.
About 40 hearings each month are conducted, in which payment plans are set up, Kline said. Those who ignore hearing notices go before a Common Pleas Court judge, who can find a defendant in contempt of court and face a potential jail sentence for not making payments.
Kline said no one so far has been found in contempt.
But the hearings before Kline have been so successful that he said he will increase the number of days he brings in defendants to the courthouse.
He plans to conduct five days of hearings in March.
“I think it will benefit the collections greatly,” Kline said.
His office collected $5.4 million last year. The office took in $4.89 million in 2011; $4.79 million in 2010; and $4.56 million in 2009, the year before Kline took office.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.