Connellsville woman arrested for shoplifting
A Connellsville woman was placed in the Westmoreland County Prison for allegedly shoplifting from a Scottdale store and being in possession of drugs.
Cortney Baker, 22, of 110 Miles Road was charged with three counts each of retail theft and criminal conspiracy, two counts of use/possession of drug paraphernalia and one count of driving without a license at District Judge Charles Moore's office.
At 1 p.m. Nov. 20, an owner of Collections by Marty contacted the Scottdale Police Department about two women in his store whom he suspected of stealing items. He told police that he was not able to prove the allegations.
Baker was one of the women. The other was Nichole Marie Snyder, 20, of 1604 Race St., Scottdale, who had previously been charged and placed in the county prison.
The descriptions of the two women matched those of two who had been at Plato's Closet, a consignment shop in Greensburg, and it was later confirmed that they were selling the stolen items in the consignment shop.
When apprehended, police asked to search Baker's purse. She pulled out two hypodermic needles, and police discovered heroin. Baker told police that she is addicted to heroin.
Baker and Snyder stole $889 worth of merchandise from Collections by Marty, police said.
A preliminary hearing for Baker has been scheduled for 9 a.m. Jan. 16 at Moore's office.
She was lodged in prison on $5,000 bail.
Mark Hofmann is a staff writer with Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.