Greensburg prison guards' union says reassignments violate pact
By Richard Gazarik
Published: Friday, Jan. 11, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
The president of the union representing corrections officers at SCI Greensburg said he will not cooperate with a state plan to reassign 250 guards to other prisons because it violates their contract.
Roy Pinto, president of the Pennsylvania Correction Officers Association, said he will not sign a proposed agreement from the Department of Corrections detailing the transfer process for the guards, who will be reassigned to other prisons when the Hempfield facility closes by June 30.
“They presented this to the union and they expected us to sign it within 15 minutes,” Pinto said. “I'm not going to sign it.”
Pinto said he will file an unfair labor practice charge against the department unless the state agrees to negotiate another deal that protects guards' contract rights.
The corrections department presented the memorandum of agreement to the union Tuesday detailing the process by which officers at SCI Greensburg and SCI Cresson in Cambria County will be reassigned to fill vacancies at other prisons.
“The way they've handled the whole thing makes no sense,” Pinto said. “They're rushing it through. I flipped out (Tuesday) when I got a call at 8:30 a.m. telling me they were going to close and come to a meeting at 2 p.m. and (they) handed me the agreement and told me to sign. We're not going to be dictated to.”
He said the contract requires the state to give the union “reasonable notice” before announcing any operational changes that would affect officers.
Spokeswoman Susan McNaughton said the department will continue to meet with union officials to reach an agreement.
“The purpose of the agreement is to help facilitate staffs' placement into new positions and ensure that employees' preferences can be considered,” she said. “The department is committed to working with employees to promptly provide them with their new job assignments. All efforts to achieve this objective have been necessary and appropriate.”
Secretary John Wetzel said closing the facilities will save $23 million when the department opens SCI Brenner in Centre County. But Pinto said the state is building two more prisons in Montgomery County in the next two years, at a cost of $400 million, to replace the aging SCI Graterford.
“I can't answer how they're saving money,” he said. “It's phony math.”
A total of 22 nurses at Greensburg and Cresson represented by Service Employees International Union Local 1199P will be affected, said SEIU Vice President Kevin Hefty in Philadelphia.
He said the union met with department officials Thursday and received information about the prison closings.
“We need to review that with nurses in Cresson and Greensburg before we make any decisions,” Hefty said. “There are some questions about how you open one prison and close two.”
With three new prisons in need of corrections officers, Pinto said employees living in Cambria and Westmoreland counties may have to accept transfers to distant locations or face furlough.
“They don't care about uprooting families. A lot of our guys have taken years to get back home, and here they go again,” he said.
Officers have until Jan. 22 to reply to a questionnaire about where they would like to be transferred.
Guards at SCI Greensburg could transfer to prisons in Pittsburgh, Fayette or Indiana counties if there are openings. If the state can't fulfill their choices, they will be transferred to other prisons.
Job offers will be based on seniority, the memo states, and officers who refuse reassignment will be laid off.
The proposal asks the union to waive a contract clause that requires that sergeants being transferred keep their current rank.
The state will try to place sergeants at other prisons at their same rank, but if there are no sergeant openings available, they will be reassigned and reduced in rank to corrections officer, according to the proposal.
Richard Gazarik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6292 or at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Latrobe couple accused of using car trunk to end son’s fear of the dark
- South Greensburg bugler still playing ‘Taps,’ but few others continue tradition
- Ligonier Y ups security in response to threat
- Police say student made Greensburg Salem bomb threat
- Gunman robs pizza delivery driver in Greensburg
- Grant funds boost Westmoreland recreation projects
- Greensburg man remains hospitalized after crash
- No tax hike in budget for Ligonier Township
- County takes lead on Monsour demolition
- Scottdale Historical Society plans Christmas House Tour
- Workers injured at Unity Township facility for youths