Share This Page

Police: Greensburg man doused self with gasoline

| Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2013, 12:02 a.m.

A Greensburg man is accused of dousing himself with gasoline inside his home and rushing a city policeman while holding a lit cigarette.

Jacob Francis Columbin, 26, of 120 N. Lincoln Ave. is charged with aggravated assault, recklessly endangering another person, resisting arrest, attempted arson and risking a catastrophe.

Columbin walked up gasoline-soaked basement stairs toward Patrolman Peter Sandberg about 1:45 p.m. Dec. 31, according to court papers filed in Greensburg District Judge James Albert's office. Columbin was holding a lit cigarette at the time, which police twice ordered him to put out.

“He then stated (an expletive) and charged at this officer, requiring me to take him to the ground,” Sandberg wrote in an affidavit. “Jacob continued to fight, requiring four officers to control him.”

No one was injured, police said.

Officers didn't taser Columbin because of concerns of igniting the spilled gasoline.

Police went to the home after a caller requested help and then hung up.

Columbin had been pouring gasoline inside the house and was attempting to light it, his cousin told police.

Sandberg said he could smell “a strong odor” of gasoline when he was outside the home.

Columbin was taken to a hospital for evaluation, police said. A warrant has been issued for his arrest.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.