Greensburg Salem backs repairs to career and technology center
Greensburg Salem school directors threw their support on Wednesday behind refurbishing the Central Westmoreland Career and Technology Center.
In an 8-0 vote, directors endorsed about $9.1 million in repair costs at the nearly 40-year-old school near New Stanton. Director Lee Kunkle didn't attend.
All nine school districts that are members of the technology center must vote to support the work for the project to move forward.
Greensburg Salem officials estimate the improvements will cost the district between $68,000 and $75,000 per year for the next 15 years. Initial annual assessments for the other districts ranged from $54,000 to $153,000, based on attendance.
In October, Brad Elwood, center director, told Greensburg Salem directors the work is for “the nuts and bolts of the building” and is not part of a renovation plan.
The technical school's roof, electrical and mechanical systems are all original to the building, which opened in 1975, Elwood said.
By doing the project as part of an energy-saving program involving Chevron, technology center officials said costs will be lower and energy savings will result.
Greensburg Salem Superintendent Eileen Amato said after the school board meeting she believes a negative vote from a school district might increase the repair costs.
In another matter, directors unanimously agreed to accept a lump-sum payment from the owner of the state office building on North Main Street, rather than 24 installment payments, as part of a tax settlement.
In taking the lump-sum payment of $289,706, directors agreed to give owner Columbia Greensburg SPE LLC a 5 percent discount.
Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.