Murrysville lights will get another look
Murrysville motorists are one step closer to a smoother drive down Route 22.
Council on Wednesday approved a study's second phase to collect traffic data at major intersections and develop new timing plans for the signals along the busy route.
Murrysville officials met with PennDOT representatives earlier this month to discuss timing issues with the traffic lights. Officials want to find a solution that would synch the signals.
“We need to come up with a strategy to address traffic and volume on that road,” said Chief Administrator Jim Morrison.
In the second phase of the study, Pittsburgh-based Trans Associates would review traffic counts at three locations along Route 22 for a seven-day period.
Software would be used to develop new signal timing.
The cost of the timing review and engineering in the second phase, which could take up to six weeks, will be $27,000.
The municipality has applied for a grant to cover a portion of the study, but a recipient has not been announced.
The traffic signals have been malfunctioning for about a decade, Morrison said.
Over the summer, council approved the first phase of the study, which cost $9,800. That portion of the study called for the company to inspect each traffic signal for correct wiring and operation of pedestrian buttons.
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6220 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.