Westmoreland GOP rally marks first Gun Appreciation Day
The Westmoreland County Republican Committee will mark the first national Gun Appreciation Day with a rally at noon Saturday outside the courthouse in Greensburg.
GOP Chairwoman Jill Cooper said the idea originated at a meeting of the county's party district chairmen.
“It was suggested we organize a peaceful demonstration to display our party's support of our Second Amendment right to bear arms. We feel it's a shared value of all people throughout Westmoreland County — not just Republicans — and everyone is invited to attend,” Cooper said.
Cooper said when word of the rally got out “there was an immediate positive response and support of more 50 people, so we decided to go ahead and apply for the (county) permit.”
A national coalition of gun rights and conservative groups proclaimed Jan. 19 as Gun Appreciation Day as a statement of protest over President Obama's push for tighter gun laws.
Charles “Chip” Gallo of Ligonier will be the guest speaker at the Greensburg rally. Attempted homicide and related charges filed against Gallo after a road rage incident were dropped by the District Attorney's Office and Ligonier Township Police.
Gallo claimed he was protecting himself in October 2011 when he twice fired a semi-automatic pistol at another Ligonier motorist. All charges against both men were dropped because neither would testify against the other.
Gallo's supporters said the state's Castle Doctrine law gave him the right to fire his weapon in self-defense.
For information on the rally, telephone 724-836-0570.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Family collecting donations for Salem man seriously injured in deer stand fall
- Drones hover at top of holiday wish lists
- Jeannette trudges through blight
- Contractor eyes early finish to work on New Stanton interchange of Interstate 70
- 2 Greensburg properties left on demo list
- Indiana County school employee allegedly showed 2 students an inappropriate photo
- Greensburg streetlights to be updated, save city $90K
- Western Pa. students bristle at changing menu choices
- $2,000 donated for abused puppies recovering at South Huntingdon shelter
- School lunch group hopes to revise rules it calls impractical, too restrictive
- Penn Park project moves forward