Bacha seeks fourth term as Westmoreland coroner
A Bacha has held the position of Westmoreland County coroner nearly 36 years.
Ken Bacha would like to see his family's dynasty hit four decades.
The 52-year-old Democrat from Greensburg announced this week he would seek a fourth term in office. His father, Leo, served 24 years as coroner before retiring in 2002.
Ken Bacha is one of three remaining Democratic row officers in the county as Republicans seized control of the courthouse two years ago.
“I hope people vote for candidates for the right reason regardless of their party,” Bacha said.
As coroner, Bacha said he oversaw an office that has had its case-load jump from about 1,300 deaths in 2002 to nearly 2,300 last year.
Bacha also instituted a policy to conduct inquests into all police-involved shootings, something he said he will continue during a fourth term.
“It puts everything out in the open, no matter how it goes or how bad an officer's shooting can look. I'm going to put it out in the open,” Bacha said.
Autopsies will continue to be farmed out to outside pathologists, he said. Dr. Cyril Wecht in Pittsburgh has for decades performed the autopsies for Westmoreland County.
During his first 11 years in office, Bacha said he has computerized records, publicized office findings on social media Internet sites and, along with his four full-time deputies, obtained a national certification as a medicolegal death investigator.
Rich Cholodofsky is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-830-6293.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.