Latrobe meters to reflect higher parking rates
Members of the Latrobe Parking Authority board on Tuesday agreed to buy new parking meter mechanisms and plates designating the increased parking rates for the newly renovated downtown parking garage.
The parking authority, which is responsible for the operation of the garage between Spring and Weldon streets, will use some of the meters that the City of Latrobe plans to purchase from Duncan Solutions Inc. of Milwaukee.
Council last week approved purchasing the mechanisms and meter plates from Duncan for a price not to exceed $150,000. The parking authority will acquire the meters through the city contract.
Alex Graziani, city manager, said the parking garage had about 100 meters before it was closed for renovations in July 2010 and the city has yet to determine the exact number of meters it wants to purchase.
The parking authority proceeded with plans to install the meters, rather than an electronic pay system with gates at the entrances and exits, because the city has not received any indication from the state whether its application for a $1.75 million redevelopment capital assistance program grant will ever be approved.
The electronic gate system costs significantly more than the meters and Graziani said the city could wait no longer for the state to approve the application.
“We were promised that we would hear something in October, November,” Graziani said. “We did not know how we could pay for it,” Graziani said of the electronic gate system.
The authority, which still plans to install security cameras at the garage, is awaiting a phone line connection so that an emergency phone in the elevator at the garage can be connected to an emergency dispatching system.
Joe Napsha is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-5252 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.