Franklin Regional to mull more than 1 valedictorian
Competition to become the top-ranked student in the Franklin Regional School District could shift as the school board considers recognizing more than one student.
Board members will consider honoring any student as a valedictorian who achieves a cumulative academic-weight rank of 4.4 or higher, beginning with the class of 2017.
A class rank of “1” would be reported on the transcript of each of those students.
During the past three years, between eight and 12 students would have met that criteria, said Ron Suvak, senior high school principal.
“We wanted to keep that student's willingness to challenge themselves,” Suvak said, explaining that the honor could motivate students.
Joe Seymour, vice president of the board, said it is important to celebrate the achievements of the student who earns the top rank.
“My first inclination is we celebrate the difference between a hundreth of a second in swimming every weekend, one stroke in golf,” he said. “My initial reaction is this is almost fodder for laughter.”
If approved, he suggested the board change the title to reflect that several students achieved top academic honors, from valedictorians to “group of salutatorians.”
The commencement speech, one of the most visible honors for the top-ranked scholar, would be delegated through a lottery system or by student votes, Suvak said.
Suvak said he will review valedictorian policies in similar school districts and compile a report for the board to consider later this month.
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6220 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.