Greensburg man admits entering apartments
A Greensburg man pleaded guilty Monday to secretly entering the apartments of two young women because he noticed them around town and started following them to learn their schedules.
John William Bennish, 60, will be sentenced at a later date for the plea on two counts each of burglary and criminal trespass, both felonies, before Judge Debra Pezze.
Assistant District Attorney Kelly Tua Hammers did not make a sentencing recommendation. Each of the burglary counts carries a prison term of up to 20 years, and the trespass counts carry a sentence of up to seven years.
Pezze said the standard guideline ranges from probation to nine months' incarceration.
Bennish, a retired technician for Siemens, was arrested March 6 in the Toll House apartment where a Seton Hill University student lived because neighbors heard unusual noises inside.
The neighbors knew the student was out of town on spring break and told police they had seen Bennish enter another woman's apartment in February 2012.
According to investigators, police searched Bennish's home and confiscated photographs of more than a dozen scantily clad women, women's underwear and pornographic videos and magazines.
Bennish told police he broke into the apartments numerous times using a plastic tool because he was infatuated with the women.
Bennish's attorney, Harry Smail Jr., said previously that Bennish found the photos that were confiscated from his home in trash receptacles.
At the time of his preliminary hearing in May, Bennish was undergoing medical counseling for an undisclosed condition, according to Smail.
Charges of stalking and harassment were dropped.
Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.