ShareThis Page

Scottdale woman makes plea on Facebook for lost ring

| Thursday, Feb. 7, 2013, 12:02 a.m.
Megan Gardiner lost her engagement ring while working at MB Bride and Modern Tux in Greensburg on Saturday, Feb. 2, 2013. Despite an exhaustive search of the bridal shop, Gardiner couldn’t find the ring, leading her to believe it was stolen. She posted this photo of the ring to Facebook in hopes of getting her ring back. submitted

Megan Gardiner can't believe someone stole her engagement ring from — of all places — a bridal shop.

But that's the only conclusion she can come to after she and her coworkers at MB Bride and Modern Tux in Greensburg searched the store high and low but couldn't find her ring after it went missing Saturday.

“I can't imagine being in a bridal store ... and taking somebody else's symbol of their relationship and ruining their trust in people,” said Gardiner, 26, of Scottdale.

She reported the theft to Greensburg police, then she reported it to social media.

On Monday night, Gardiner posted her plight on Facebook, asking everyone she knows to be on the lookout for the ring. Less than two days later, her post had been shared more than 2,000 times, keeping up her hope that the ring might be found.

“I hope that if someone does have it, they would reconsider and return it,” Gardiner said. “It's not just a piece of jewelry. It means a lot for us.”

Gardiner, who works as a sales consultant at MB Bride and a substitute teacher, said she was working at the bridal shop Saturday morning when she used the restroom.

She took off the ring to wash her hands and then went back to work. Five minutes later, she realized her ring was missing.

Gardiner rushed to the single-stall bathroom to find a customer coming out. The woman said she hadn't seen Gardiner's ring on the counter.

“My first instinct was it's in the drain,” Gardiner said.

She and her coworkers started an exhaustive search — in the garbage, in a closet, in the soap dispenser, behind the toilet and the sink — but didn't find the ring.

A maintenance man was called and he took the drain apart, but found nothing.

They looked throughout the store — in every dressing room, under the vending machine and in every dress — but the ring didn't turn up.

Gardiner said she realized the ring was stolen.

MB Bride manager Jennifer Mason said the staff told customers in the store that if anyone had the ring she could put it back in the bathroom and no questions would be asked.

“Having an engagement ring stolen from an actual bridal store is absolutely disturbing,” Mason said.

After filing a police report, Gardiner returned to the store to finish her shift on a busy Saturday, but she looked for her ring every chance she got.

“She was a trouper,” Mason said. “She tried to keep her composure all day.”

Gardiner said her fiance, Patrick Booley, 31, surprised her with the ring in July.

“I was totally shocked,” she said. “I had no idea he was going to ask me.”

Booley had begun searching for the right ring in November 2011, found it last February and then waited months for the right moment to pop the question.

The white gold, vintage-inspired diamond ring was a perfect choice for her personality, Gardiner said.

With or without the ring, Gardiner and Booley continue to plan their New Year's Eve wedding.

“There is a lot of emotion and sentiment, and it was a symbol of a lot for us,” Gardiner said. “It was a big landmark in our relationship, and we hope someday it will come back to us.”

Jennifer Reeger is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6155 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.