Jeannette man's guilty plea delayed in van assault
A Jeannette man was given two months to get his personal belongings into a storage unit and make arrangements for his six cats before he pleads guilty to running over a woman in a Hempfield parking lot last year.
Judge Al Bell on Friday permitted Terrence Lee Stubbs, 54, to enter a guilty plea in two months. Stubbs's attorney, Louis Kober, requested that a sentence be deferred to allow Stubbs time to prepare.
“He has to make arrangements to rent a storage space,” Kober told Bell.
Stubbs had been scheduled to plead guilty on Friday. Assistant District Attorney Thomas Grace said prosecutors were recommending a sentence of two to four years in a state prison in exchange for Stubbs pleading guilty to aggravated assault and aggravated assault by vehicle.
He allegedly cursed multiple times at Kim Fetter of Harrison City on Oct. 11, 2011. She asked Stubbs to move his van when she was unable to exit her car because Stubbs allegedly parked his van too close.
Stubbs moved his van in the Dollar Tree parking lot in Hempfield Plaza along Route 30.
When Fetter returned from shopping, she and Stubbs exchanged words. She photographed Stubbs' license plate number with her cellphone. Stubbs allegedly put his van in reverse and struck Fetter twice.
On Friday, Stubbs told Bell that he had hoped the negotiated sentence would be shorter and that he would be able to keep his apartment while incarcerated.
“I expected to pay my rent for a year,” Stubbs said.
Bell scheduled a plea hearing for April.
“You have two months — that's it,” he said.
Fetter suffered knee and ankle sprains and a head contusion. Restitution is “substantial,” and a final amount has not been determined, Grace said.
Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.