Franklin Regional's '1 top scholar' tradition to continue
Although it might come down to a mere fraction of a point, Franklin Regional School District will continue to honor only one graduating senior as valedictorian.
After a lengthy debate during Monday's school board meeting, directors voted 7-1 in favor of retaining the Murrysville high school's tradition of naming just one top scholar.
Earlier this month, board members debated honoring any student who meets the necessary criteria. The proposed honor system would have begun with the Class of 2017.
“We have some very high-achieving students here, and I get that,” Director Kimberly Bondi said.
But she said she does not want to take away from the achievement of the highest scholar and voted to support the tradition.
In order to earn the valedictorian title, a student must achieve a cumulative academic-weight rank of a 4.4 grade point average or higher.
Typically, the top students' ranks are separated by hundredths of a point, Principal Ron Suvak said.
“It's very competitive,” he said. “Students tend to make instructional decisions based on how it will impact their class rank.”
All seniors who earn a 4.0 or higher — usually between 60 and 80 — are recognized at a banquet every year, Suvak said. During the past three years, between eight and 12 students each year would have met the criteria to be named as a valedictorian, he said.
Suvak said he made the recommendation to reflect what he believes is the district's mission.
“Overwhelmingly, a majority of colleges don't require class rank and a large majority of students don't report class rank” on college applications, he said.
Amanda Dolasinski is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-6220 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.