ShareThis Page

Team's raid nabs teens for trafficking heroin from N. Huntingdon hotel

Paul Peirce
| Friday, Feb. 22, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Jeffrey Baldwin Jr., 19, of Turtle Creek was charged with selling heroin from a North Huntingdon hotel room.
Jeffrey Baldwin Jr., 19, of Turtle Creek was charged with selling heroin from a North Huntingdon hotel room.
Jermaine D. Cobb, 19, of Turtle Creek was charged with selling heroin out of a North Huntingdon hotel room.
Jermaine D. Cobb, 19, of Turtle Creek was charged with selling heroin out of a North Huntingdon hotel room.

Acting on a tip that two men were dealing drugs out of a North Huntingdon hotel room near the Pennsylvania Turnpike interchange, members of the state police special drug interdiction team Wednesday arrested two Allegheny County teenagers for selling a large amount of heroin.

Jeffrey N. Baldwin Jr., 19, of 111 Valley Park Drive, and Jermaine D. Cobb Jr., 19, of 659 Mercer St., both in Turtle Creek, were charged by state police after a raid of a room in the Holiday Inn Express off Route 30 resulted in the seizure of about 20 bricks of heroin plus a small amount of marijuana.

A brick of heroin is equivalent to 50 “stamp bags,” or doses of powder heroin.

The pair are charged with multiple complaints of possession of heroin and marijuana, dealing in proceeds from an unlawful activities and criminal use of communication devices.

They were arraigned before Night Court Judge Michael Mahady and placed in the county prison on $100,000 bail each.

According to affidavits of probable cause, police received a tip of suspicious activities with visitors going in and out of a room at the hotel around 10:40 a.m. Wednesday. Investigators learned that a white man rented the hotel room on Tuesday, but two young black men on Wednesday paid cash to stay an extra two days.

Undercover troopers started conducting surveillance of the room and noticed that the occupants' “cell phones were ringing at various times, and immediately after the phones would ring, a person would arrive at the hotel and knock on (the door),” according to the affidavit of probable cause filed by Trooper David Loeffler.

Police reported none of the “visitors” would enter the room, and the transactions took place in the hallway.

At about 2 p.m., troopers decided to knock on the hotel room door, but there was no immediate answer. Troopers said they smelled burning marijuana coming from inside.

A short time later, Loeffler said, the door opened and troopers found Cobb and Baldwin inside. A large amount of cash lay on a night stand, and numerous clear plastic bags “with numerous bundles of heroin” were in view on another night stand. Other bags of heroin lay on the floor.

Police said Cobb consented to a search of a duffle bag where more suspected drugs were located.

“Cobb said that there was not anything illegal (in the bag) and gave consent to search. A search of the bag resulted in the seizure of 479 stamp bags of heroin,” Loeffler reported in the affidavit.

In all, police seized 979 stamp bags of suspected heroin, valued at nearly $20,000; a “small” plastic bag containing marijuana; four cell phones and $3,722.

While looking through a backpack containing Baldwin's personal identification, police said they found a potato chip bag that contained five bricks of heroin.

Preliminary hearings are scheduled Feb. 27 before North Huntingdon District Judge Douglas Weimer.

Paul Peirce is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-850-2860 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.