Share This Page

Philadelphia called 'appropriate location' for commissioning of USS Somerset

| Saturday, March 2, 2013, 10:41 a.m.

The Families of Flight 93 called Philadelphia an “appropriate location” to commission a Navy ship in memory of their loved ones.

Pennsylvania Sens. Pat Toomey and Bob Casey have introduced a resolution in the U.S. Senate encouraging the Navy to commission the USS Somerset in Philadelphia.

“The family organization is in full support,” Gordon Felt, president of the Flight 93 group, said Friday.

“I believe that is the most appropriate location, and I believe the families will strongly encourage the secretary of the Navy to do all he can that the commissioning will occur in Philadelphia,” said Patrick White, former group president.

Felt's brother, Edward, and White's cousin, Louis J. Nacke II, were among the 40 passengers and crew members aboard United Flight 93 on Sept. 11, 2001. The passengers and crew fought back against terrorists who had commandeered the plane, which crashed in a field in Stonycreek Township in Somerset County. All on board died.

The USS Somerset is the ninth and newest amphibious warfare ship in the San Antonio class. The ship joins the USS New York and USS Arlington in remembering the 9/11 heroes.

The history of Flight 93 and its ties to Pennsylvania make Philadelphia a perfect location, Felt said.

“We thought it fitting that it be commissioned in the commonwealth,” he said.

Having the commissioning in Philadelphia will make it easier for more family members to attend, White said, because the majority live in the Northeast.

He attended the ship's christening last year in Avondale, La., which he called a “spectacular event.”

He said he expects the commissioning to be just as memorable.

Bob Stiles is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-836-6622 or bstiles@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.