Youngstown, Pa., woman admits hiding cocaine for weeks in body cavity
A Youngstown woman who was arrested after a police chase last month waited two weeks before telling a police officer that she was concealing cocaine in a body cavity.
Tonya Lee Piper, 30, was arrested along with Ronald N. Seybold, 44, of Latrobe on Feb. 7, after Trooper John Isoldi saw Piper, who was wanted on an arrest warrant, enter Seybold's truck on Murtha Way in Derry Township.
Police chased Seybold's 1998 Ford Ranger for several miles through Derry and Unity townships before it crashed into a car in Latrobe.
Seybold struggled with police at the scene, Isoldi wrote in an affidavit.
Piper was jailed on an active warrant for drug-related charges and told police that “both she and (Seybold) had thrown out a substantial quantity of narcotics from the vehicle,” Isoldi wrote.
Piper was arraigned and sent to the Westmoreland County Prison. During a preliminary hearing on Feb. 20 before District Judge Mark Bilik, she told Isoldi that she had been concealing cocaine in a body cavity since her arrest, police said.
She asked to be taken to a hospital, where 14 grams of cocaine — about a half-ounce — was removed from her body, police said.
She faces additional charges of possession, contraband and possession with the intent to deliver, police said. Her hearing on the original charges is scheduled to resume on Wednesday before Bilik.
Seybold was charged with aggravated assault, fleeing police, reckless endangering, resisting arrest, disorderly conduct, driving on the wrong side of the roadway, passing a vehicle on the wrong side of the road, reckless driving and multiple traffic violations.
He waived his right to a preliminary hearing and remains jailed on those charges.
Mary Pickels is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-836-5401 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.