Ligonier council OK's hotel plan
Ligonier residents Adam and Michelle Gardner say they hope to have Thistledown at Seger House — a hotel housed in the former McGinnis Hospital — open by July.
Ligonier Borough Council on Thursday approved the couple's plans for the eight-room hotel at 221 W. Main St.
Hotels must be approved on an individual basis, according to the borough's zoning ordinance.
The eight rooms — each with a private bathroom — will occupy the historic mansion's second and third floors. The first floor will house Michelle Gardner's yarn shop Bo-Peep Fine Yarns, which will relocate from the Ligonier Diamond, and a small cafe and lounge area.
“We're looking to restore the original beauty and look of the building,” said architect Loren Wright of Pittsburgh-based Piper O'Brien Herr Architects.
Wright said work on the building will include “primary interior renovations with minor exterior modifications.”
Under the name Scout LLC, the Gardners bought the property from Excela Health for $265,000 in January, according to county real estate records. It has been vacant and for sale since Excela Health closed the SurgiCenter of Ligonier in June 2011.
“I'd like to see this thing fly. It's a nice addition to our town,” Councilman Jim McDonnell said.
The $50,000 original construction of the Victorian-style mansion finished in 1918. It was owned by the Seger family until 1944 when the Allegheny County Sisters of Mercy purchased the building for $34,500 to start a hospital.
The building includes three kitchens and an indoor swimming pool in the basement that has been boarded over for years.
Jewels Phraner reports for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.