Turnpike motorist charged with driving 8 miles in wrong direction
A 24-year-old Allegheny County man will make his first court appearance Thursday on charges of driving the wrong direction for 8 miles along the Pennsylvania Turnpike in Westmoreland County.
Nicholas J. Greiner of 1354 4th Ave., Coraopolis, is charged by state police at New Stanton with driving under the influence of alcohol, driving on a suspended license, and driving on the wrong side of the highway after the Jan. 11 incident.
Trooper Charles Pravlik reported in an affidavit of probable cause filed before Norvelt District Judge Roger Eckels that the turnpike had to be temporarily closed between the Donegal and New Stanton interchanges during the episode. Police allege Greiner entered the eastbound lane of the turnpike interchange near Donegal at milepost 90 and drove westbound for about 8 miles before he stopped.
Pravlik said the turnpike received numerous reports of a wrong-way driver from other motorists as Greiner drove from Donegal toward Mt. Pleasant.
State police said when troopers arrived, Greiner was “unsteadily leaning” against his 2012 Chevrolet Cruz on the side of the toll road. Police said he refused a blood draw at Excela Westmoreland Hospital in Greensburg and smelled of alcohol.
Attempts to reach Greiner for comment were unsuccessful.
Greiner's hearing is scheduled Thursday before Eckels.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.